Antivirus Performance Comparison

They are capable of doing many things, from taking over hard disk space to getting access to your personal information or draining your CPU. There are numerous anti-virus programs on the market to protect your devices from such issues. It is essential to select an antivirus that has a minimal impact on the system performance. Every antivirus program we offer is tested against this factor. The results below are basing them on the length of time it takes each program to perform an operation. For instance, Kaspersky Security Cloud Free had a background impact of 6percent while running an entire scan, while ESET had a slightly greater impact of 12 percent.

The German-based Avira is well-known avastantivirusreview.com/here-are-5-most-progressive-features-of-a-board-management-software in our tests and consistently scores above the 90% mark in all three categories: Performance, Protection and Usability (False Positives). Its interface is also user easy to use and comes with a variety of functions, including a clever firewall and a variety of privacy tools. Avira subscriptions are priced per month rather than for a fixed time period of 1-3 years. This makes it easier to cancel the subscription or change the terms at any time.

Essentware was formerly known as PCKeeper is a fairly new name in our tests. It uses the Avira Engine that runs under the hood. Overall it scored quite well. Its interface is simple to use and its performance was satisfactory this month, although there were some issues with stability, mainly with scanning jobs locking up – have lowered the rating. The detection was satisfactory and a perfect run of the certification sets earned VB100.